tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post119959725462443184..comments2024-03-18T04:36:26.547-04:00Comments on Paul Levinson's Infinite Regress: Remembering Tony Schwartz: Master of PropagandaPaul Levinsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07609987407926836519noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post-18868629639340485622008-09-30T14:08:00.000-04:002008-09-30T14:08:00.000-04:00And what does that have to do with "progressive"?And what does that have to do with "progressive"?Paul Levinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07609987407926836519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post-3978558075898770152008-09-30T13:59:00.000-04:002008-09-30T13:59:00.000-04:00merely this: Artists use Lies to tell the Truth w...merely this: Artists use Lies to tell the Truth while politicians use them to cover it up.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02991256849605736360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post-55145368972940081292008-09-30T13:27:00.000-04:002008-09-30T13:27:00.000-04:00LBJ was a great, progressive President when it cam...LBJ was a great, progressive President when it came to domestic policy.<BR/><BR/>And he was one of the worst, criminal, constitution-trampling Presidents in foreign policy - in his escalation of the Vietnam War.<BR/><BR/>So, what, exactly is your point, dean-o?Paul Levinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07609987407926836519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post-88097945271582892112008-09-30T12:28:00.000-04:002008-09-30T12:28:00.000-04:00Hmm. LBJ was the anti-warmonger. yet, after re-e...Hmm. LBJ was the anti-warmonger. yet, after re-election, he escalated our troop involvement from a truly advisory force to over 500,000. <BR/>50,000 kids that died in 'nam ... Was electing LBJ progress? Is that progressive?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02991256849605736360noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post-34971905139524024022008-06-19T15:19:00.000-04:002008-06-19T15:19:00.000-04:00Good question: I think sound never really left th...Good question: I think sound never really left the center stage - if you think about popularity of Top 40 radio in the 1950s, FM Radio in the 60s and 70s, and then MP3s and CDs in the 1990s-now.<BR/><BR/>Videos were briefly in the spotlight when MTV broke through in the 80s, but sound was always there, waiting to come back strong in the 90s. (YouTube is making music videos more important, again, but still not as strong as MP3s.)Paul Levinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07609987407926836519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post-42135628908357975932008-06-19T14:52:00.000-04:002008-06-19T14:52:00.000-04:00He sounded like a very interesting and unique man....He sounded like a very interesting and unique man. Let me ask you this honestly I had this conversation with my husband, In the 80's I'm sure you remember the song Video killed the radio star while I think it was true then with the invention of MTV(my generation-there were plenty of songs that became famous because of the video not the song)I do not feel video rules now. Why do you think the shift went back to sound?dawnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10741158153974994260noreply@blogger.com