tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post7855018554496581246..comments2024-03-18T04:36:26.547-04:00Comments on Paul Levinson's Infinite Regress: Continuing Journeyman: 4Paul Levinsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07609987407926836519noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post-5106369569347890362011-02-23T08:28:19.908-05:002011-02-23T08:28:19.908-05:00What is a majorana neutrino?
Six years ago, a few ...What is a majorana neutrino?<br />Six years ago, a few thought an electron neutrino might be a tachyon. Can anything be a tachyon or take on the qualities of a tachyon?<br />Can either tachyon condensation or a coupling capture an electron or obtain a charge?<br />Is it possible that any of the above create a charge tipped vortex? Only unstable from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle?<br />If tachyon coupling can occur with ie a neutrino, may it also with Higgs or any other particle pertaining to the 4 fund. forces?<br />If so, can the chroniton-like tendencies capture a muon in decay (releasing an electron neutrino, with a coupling phenonemon?<br />Is it possible that any of the above create a charge tipped vortex?<br />May one charge-tipped vortex "space displace" with an opposite charge vortex?<br />Could vortices be selected or manipulated by EM specra or a tachyon impeded < planke constant black hole?<br />Could instantaneous, spectral, tachyon-coupled extension vortices take travelers or probes by space-displacement through magnetic anomalies like Oregon’s ‘Mystery Spot”, through sunspots, other stars, black holes, galaxies and planets with corresponding fields and spectra?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post-66881140883912285032007-10-16T19:31:00.000-04:002007-10-16T19:31:00.000-04:00Good comments, folks.To second anonymous: you may ...Good comments, folks.<BR/><BR/>To second anonymous: you may be on to something. Greg Benford - a physicist and science fiction writer (and friend) - has a good novel, Timescape, in which scientists communicate to the past via tachyons. So our scientist in Journeyman could indeed have been using such a device to contact Dan in the past.<BR/><BR/>I'm also thinking that this scientist may know a lot more about the "project" that Dan (and Livia) are unintentionally a part of (though we don't know how much Livia knows about what is really going on).<BR/><BR/>Matt: Yeah, so far we've seen few ripples. The lawyer surviving last week had some good effects - but nothing major.Paul Levinsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07609987407926836519noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post-24970802493162489382007-10-16T03:33:00.000-04:002007-10-16T03:33:00.000-04:00"i'm guessing because he knew his father..."i don'..."i'm guessing because he knew his father..."<BR/><BR/>i don't see the connection. think about this... let's consider 2007 as the past ok? and let's say you have Dan's abilities...Let's say in 2014 YOU are going to talk to a person named JOHN DOE, and definitely, it is your first time talking to him. THEN, you transport back in the past... secs later... JOHN DOE calls you.<BR/><BR/>We do know that JOHN DOE does not know you in 2007 because you only met him (or are supposed to meet him) in 2014. It does not follow our law of CAUSALITY...but the keypoint is what Dan was asking...Tachyons, w/c i dunno nothing about but somewhat explains how the scientist was able to call him in the pastAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post-15899581890202740482007-10-16T02:45:00.000-04:002007-10-16T02:45:00.000-04:00I am guessing because he knew his father... There ...I am guessing because he knew his father... <BR/><BR/>There is one thing that is really bothering me though. There doesn't seem to be a butterfly effect in all this when you would suspect there would be. <BR/><BR/>Where are the ripples? I want to see the wider net of these changed events in his modern life.MChttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16984793682474594967noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2289595359432630118.post-43696600108208893862007-10-16T02:18:00.000-04:002007-10-16T02:18:00.000-04:00oh my god. i loved the show tonight. same as you, ...oh my god. i loved the show tonight. same as you, i am intrigued , and more drawn to the enigmatic livia, and dan's relationship. but that scientist calling dan in the past....its driving me crazy. how did he know about dan in the past when dan only spoke to him for the first time in the present?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com