22 December 2024: The three latest written interviews of me are here, here and here.
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Friday, October 23, 2020

Why the US Gov Going after Google is Not a Good Idea


Welcome to Light On Light Through, Episode 151, in which I argue that the U. S. government pursuing anti-trust action against Google is not a good idea.   My reasons range from media evolution, which responds to human needs, taking care of information monopolies as it did regarding Microsoft's near-monopoly in the 1990s, to Trump's real reasons for going after Google.

Links to articles and books mentioned in the podcast:

Other relevant podcast episodes:


Check out this episode!

Friday, October 19, 2012

The Good Wife 4.3: "Template Based Link Analysis Algorithm"

Another sassy, technologically hip episode 4.3 of The Good Wife last Sunday, featuring Dominic Chianese, of Sopranos Uncle Junior fame, as an elderly hard-of-hearing judge trying a high-powered case at the cutting edge of social media and how they can operate in our society.

It was a good night for Chianese, with simultaneous appearances in The Good Wife and Boardwalk Empire, both on at 9pm Eastern (see my review of Boardwalk Empire).  Chianese was especially excellent as the judge on The Good Wife, turning out to be totally on top of the high-tech courtroom action, signalling his command with a comment about "a template based link analysis algorithm".

The case involves manipulating Google searches to bury adversaries in the search results.  Like all the episode on The Good Wife this year, last Sunday's was ripped from the headlines, to borrow a phrase usually used for Law and Order.  With  Presidential election day just a few weeks from now, last Spring's Republican primary, and the possible ascendency of Rick Santorum in that process, seems long ago.  But when Santorum looked to be riding high, a manipulation of Google to give an unpleasant result in searches on his name - a piece of clever, nasty work which actually had been done a few years ago - achieved more than a little attention in some places.

On The Good Wife, Will gets a lesson in what can be done to anyone with a sufficiently technologically sophisticated adversary.  Will's  not only buys off his clients, but rigs Google so that searches on Will's name bring up a "disbarred lawyer" tag.  Not likely to help the firm in its quest to become financially solvent.

Fortunately, Alicia has better results in her personal affairs.  Not only does no one have evidence of her and Will's affair, but when an intern claims she slept with Peter, Kalinda gets her to unwittingly reveal that she was lying.  This leads to a  great next-to-last scene in which Alicia kisses Peter (the last scene was Will searching on his name).

But speaking of reunions, Kalinda and her husband's is wearing thin already.  I'd much rather see Kalinda working cases, than going through lame kinky scenes with the husband.

Hey, if you like Dominic Chianese, he's an lengthy video interview I did with him several years ago, about his work on The Sopranos:




transcript
of the interview




See also The Good Wife 4.1 Meets Occupy Wall Street ... The Good Wife 4.2: Reunited

And see also The Good Wife 3.1: Recusal and Rosh Hashanah ... The Good Wife: 3.2: Periwigs and Skype ... The Good Wife 3.7: Peter v. Will ...  Dexter's Sister on The Good Wife 3.10  ... The Good Wife 3.12: Two Suits  ... The Good Wife 3.13 Meets Murder on the Orient Express ... The Good Wife 3.15: Will and Baseball

And see also  The Good Wife Starts Second Season on CBS ... The Good Wife 2.2: Lou Dobbs, Joe Trippi, and Obama Girl ... The Good Wife 2.4: Surprise Candidate, Intimate Interpsonal Distance ... The Good Wife 2.9 Takes on Capital Punishment ... The Good Wife 2.16: Information Wars

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Three Cheers to Google for Standing Up to China

Three cheers for Google's momentous decision to no longer go along with the Chinese government's attempt to censor the results of Google searches. The current regime in China has a long and disgraceful record of limiting the access of its own people to international information. Like the worst totalitarian regimes of the 20th century, the Chinese government - which has progressed in many other ways - continues to try to keep its people in a bubble of carefully controlled information.

As the Soviet Union found with samizdat video and even Nazi Germany discovered with the brave White Rose, such attempts at controlling information, of treating your people like children or prisoners, do not work. Sooner or later, information breaks through. Fortunately for freedom, information is inherently corrosive to oppressive regimes.

I was disappointed that Google ever agreed to play ball in the first place with the Chinese government. But Google has made up for this now, with a courageous stand that will ultimately help bring the most populous nation in the world fully into the 21st century. Whatever ad revenue Google may lose by not being currently available in China will be more than made up by the great boost to democracy and freedom of expression that Google's action proclaims.

And, in the long run, likely sooner than later, not only the rest of the world but China will thank Google for pressing it to step up to our new century of information, to become a full participant in our world of new new media, where increasingly anyone anywhere can be not only a consumer but a producer.
InfiniteRegress.tv