"Paul Levinson's It's Real Life is a page-turning exploration into that multiverse known as rock and roll. But it is much more than a marvelous adventure narrated by a master storyteller...it is also an exquisite meditation on the very nature of alternate history." -- Jack Dann, The Fiction Writer's Guide to Alternate History

Monday, August 31, 2020

Lovecraft Country 1.3: Anthology

It should be apparent by now that Lovecraft Country is an anthology of separate stories set on a foundation of a continuing underlying story, rather than just a straightforward continuing story.  This has the effect of making the underlying story more difficult to follow, but allowing the series to explore a lot more than one classic horror trope.

Last night, episode 1.3 brought us a deeply haunted house.  Leti buys it, a real fix-me up, on the white side of Chicago.  She not only encounters all manner of ghostly inhabitants in the basement, but white racist hoodlums who put up a burning KKK cross on her lawn and do their best to frighten her into leaving the house.  She of course isn't frightened by them - she has the ghosts to worry about - and before the episode is over, the racists get their due comeuppance.

Meanwhile, the underlying story has at least once excellent development:  Leti and Atticus have at it.  This is handled with grace and sensitivity and vulnerability.   Amidst all the horror around them, it's good to see human relationships triumphing.

Unfortunately, it looks like Uncle George is indeed dead.  But when you're dealing with magic and horror, it's always important to keep in mind that dead isn't the same as in our non-magical world, in which the horror can and does have irrevocable effects.   So can we look forward to George returning, and, if so, in a fully corporeal human not ghostly fashion?

Just one of the things I'll be watching for in the weeks ahead.

See also Lovecraft Country 1.1: Racist Police Get Horror Comeuppance ... Lovecraft Country 1.2: Malleable Dreams

 

Sunday, August 30, 2020

We Hunt Together 1.4: No Murder, But ...



There was no murder in We Hunt Together 1.4.  But the build-up to it made for an outstanding episode, since it unveiled and moved forward lots of crucial things.

For instance, Jackson's wife is having an affair and Jackson knows about it.  This is revealed after Jackson substitutes his own specimen for Lola's, so she can pass a drug test (good thing they don't test for DNA and gender in those kinds of tests).  And this in turn occurs after we learn why Lola is a druggie: it's to bury guilt she feels for killing a mother and daughter in an auto accident on a "roundabout" - an accident that as Jackson points out was a really an accident and not so much Lola's fault.  All of that is quite a powerful packet of information.

Meanwhile, we learn an equivalent amount about Freddy.  Her real name is Lily, and she took the name Freddy because the real Freddy, Lily's best friend, took her life, after a music teacher - whom Lily (our Freddy) later pushed down the stairs - did something inappropriate (as in sexual) to the original, real Freddy.

All of this is important because Freddy (originally Lily) has brought Babu back to her school, to meet the music teacher, now in a wheelchair, because Freddy wants Babu to kill the music teacher.  This is a good thing - not ethically but plot-wise - because Jackson and Lola may well need another murder to keep their investigation going.   Bad luck and Lola going for a swig of drug got in the way of Lola seeing Freddy and Babu together, which would have cracked the case wide open right there.

See what I mean about this being one fine episode even without a murder?  Back with another review next week.

See also We Hunt Together 1.1: Compelling Pairs ... We Hunt Together 1.2: Upping the Game ... We Hunt Together 1.3: Fine Tuning

 

Thursday, August 27, 2020

The Petersens: Sunshine

 I thought I'd tell you about The Petersens, a piece of sunshine in music, always welcome, but especially so in these deeply dangerous times.

The Petersens are a family group, three sisters, their brother, their mother, and a friend, who do splendid covers of country, folk, and gleaming pop songs.   Family groups are nothing new, ranging from the Andrew Sisters to the Isley Brothers to the Cowsills.  They have a natural advantage in vocal harmonies that seem linked together since birth, because they are.  The rhythm of their instruments sound like they are all being played by the same person because, well, they almost are.

But The Petersens also have subtle and winning differences in their vocal timber, which makes it a special treat to hear one or the other, usually a sister, sing lead.  Julianne, the youngest, plays mandolin and has a perfectly expressive voice sounding like an instrument itself. Here she is singing Fields of Gold.  Ellen, the middle sister, plays an unerring banjo, and delivers a cover of Jolene almost as good as Dolly's and at least as good as Miley's.  Katie is the oldest sister and the leader of the band.  She plays a killer fiddle and has a straight-up beautiful country voice.  Here she is singing Country Roads, up on YouTube at the end of May, already almost 6.5 million views, one of my all-time favorite songs.

Matt the brother plays guitar and puts in harmony like honey.  Karen aka Mama plays an ever-bouncing stand-up bass.  And Emmett Franz, the friend, plays dobro, sort of like a slide guitar, but much better picking.  (Hey, here I am raving about this group, and I usually don't even listen that much to this kind of music.)

But one of the best things about watching and listening to The Petersens is not the music they play and the songs they sing, but how they so very much enjoy doing it.  There's not a video of them on YouTube in which one or more of them is not smiling from ear to ear as one of their siblings sings lead or steps up to the microphone with a choice bluegrass part.

Highly recommended, because truly a pleasure.  I'll leave you with The Petersens, Katie in the lead, singing James Taylor's "Carolina in My Mind".




Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Written Report on Day 2 of 2020 Republican National Convention: Lies

I didn't watch much of last night's First Night of the 2020 Republican National Convention.  I made up for that by watching just about all of the Second Night of the convention, tonight.  Here's what I saw and heard: lies.

  • Lies from Senator Rand Paul, who praised Trump for bringing home our troops.  The truth: Trump has brought home no troops, as far anyone in the public knows or the press has reported.  I've been against overseas American military involvement since Vietnam.  Trump has done nothing to reduce that.
  • Lies from Director of the U. S. National Economic Council Larry Kudlow, who said that Biden wants to raise everyone's taxes.  The truth: Biden only wants to raise taxes on people who earn more than $400,000.   That leaves me out.  What about you?
  • Lies from former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, who said the Chinese Communist Party "covered up" the deadly COVID-19 virus.  The truth: No evidence for that.  Although the Chinese government may not have been as helpful as they could have been in alerting the world to COVID-19, Chinese scientists were the first to publicly let the world know about the deadly disease.
  • Lies from Eric Trump (Donald Trump's son), who said Biden will raise taxes on over 80% of Americans.  See what I pointed out about Kudlow above, and do the arithmetic: those in America who earn more than $400,000 a year are a small fraction of the American people, not 80%.  Ok, I did the research and math: those earning more than $400,000 a year are in the top 1%.
  • Lies from Melania Trump, First Lady, who said Donald Trump "loves" this country.  I don't believe that.  I think the truth is that Trump loves only himself.  But I'm willing to acknowledge that this is a difference of opinion, not an outright lie.  So perhaps, technically, Melania Trump didn't lie tonight. 
But even if Melania Trump didn't actually lie, she would be the only one of the speakers mentioned above.  That's a very poor percentage for truth in what we heard tonight.


Captain Phil interviews Paul Levinson about the 2020 Democratic National Convention


Welcome to Light On Light Through, Episode 142, in which the inimitable Captain Phil (on WUSB Radio) interviews me again, this time about the 2020 Democratic National Convention, conducted virtually, which concluded last week.  Special treat: Phil plays "Samantha" from my new album, Welcome Up: Songs of Space and Time, right before the interview.

Further listening:

1. Four nightly assessments of the Democratic National Convention:

2. More about my music:


Check out this episode!

Monday, August 24, 2020

Lovecraft Country 1.2: Malleable Dreams


I decided to watch Lovecraft Country 1.2 tonight - though it was on last night - instead of the first night of the Republican National Convention because, come on, you know which one was the greater horror.

But Lovecraft Country nonetheless had horror a plenty, which I'll talk about in a minute or two, after I go over two of my favorite ingredients.

The music in this series is brilliantly chosen.  I have to give a shout-out to "The End," because the one and only Jimmy Krondes wrote the music all those decades ago.  And, I actually wrote some songs with Jimmy, too, a few years after he wrote "The End".  Here's a YouTube video of one of them - Snow Flurries (#s 38, 59, 86 on this list were also written by Jimmy Krondes and me.)

The other stand-out ingredient is the acting.  I mentioned Jonathan Majors as Atticus, and Jurnee Smollett and Courtney B. Vance in other lead roles in my review of the first episode last week.  The second episode gives us a good  couple of scenes with Michael Kenneth Williams as Montrose, who is Atticus's father.  I've never seen an actor (includes actress) from The Wire in another role who wasn't excellent - I often think that series was the best ever on television - and it was great to see Williams aka Omar Little doing what he does again in Lovecraft Country.  My only regret is that I hope Vance's character (Atticus's Uncle) didn't die.

I don't know the story (haven't read the novel), so I don't know that he did.  But (and here we get to the plot) there's apparently a pretty good chance that anyone who is killed in Lovecraft Country can be brought back to life, if they were even dead in the first place, as long Atticus does what the powers that be want of him.  It worked with Leti (Jurnee Smollett) in this episode.  I'm still not clear exactly what's going on, but apparently a lot of what happens to people are dreams, illusion, or being under spells, which are more amenable to alteration and improvement than real life.

See you back here, I hope, next week.

See also Lovecraft Country 1.1: Racist Police Get Horror Comeuppance

 



 

We Hunt Together 1.3: Fine Tuning



We learned a lot about our major quarter of characters in We Hunt Together 1.3 on Showtime last night.

Baba doesn't like to kill.  In fact, he wants to recapture some of the small boy that he was in Africa, before being a child soldier claimed his body and a lot of his soul, and turned in him into a killer.  Freddy says she wants to help him in that quest, but of course she lies about just about everything.

Indeed, she wants Baba to do her killing.   Significantly, she doesn't follow through on her threat to kill the captive, leaving him instead for Baba to dispatch.  But she isn't angry about Baba when she discovers he let the captive go, because he wound up dead, anyway, the result of jumping out of nowhere onto a highway in the path of a speeding vehicle.  Does that tell her that God is on their side?  Possibly, though I doubt that Freddy much believes in any deity other than her own rapacious sense of self.

Meanwhile, Jackson is coming forth as a very likeable character.   His easy smile and laugh and overall manner are an excellent invitation to take his razor-sharp logic to heart.  Further, though he talks a good case for boundaries, he's on the clock almost 24 hours a day on this case, more than Lola, whose intensity and appetite for hard work is muted into unconsciousness brought on by the drug she takes at night.

Jackson's wife, though, sees how much he enjoys working with Lola, and would like to meet her.  Jackson so far seems like a straight arrow, but it strikes me that anything is possible in this unfolding story.  Jackson's ethics would almost no doubt enable him to resist of any of Freddy's flirtations, but what if he found himself alone with Lola on a long night, and she was in need of some sort of comforting.

At this point, she remains the most difficult character to categorize.  Flawed for sure, but not in a way that seems to compromise her reasoning powers as detective.  She's a fine match for Freddy, who isn't flawed at all - unless you consider being a psycho killer, along the lines Villanelle in Killing Eve, who also combines nonchalant humor and murder to a tee, to be a flaw.

See you back here next week.  I do wish We Hunt Together was streaming rather than being doled out on a weekly basis.  But I'll take it.

See also We Hunt Together 1.1: Compelling Pairs ... We Hunt Together 1.2: Upping the Game 

 

Great New Review of Welcome Up: Songs of Space and Time



 thank you Jon Pruett and Ugly Things Magazine

Welcome Up: Songs of Space and Time  - digitalCDvinyl

Saturday, August 22, 2020

We Hunt Together 1.2: Upping the Game


A belated review of We Hunt Together 1.2, which really upped its game.

First, the killing team of Freddy and Baba got another two murders under their belts - or, in at least one case, up hanging from a tree - which is a lot more than the usual one you'd expect from serial killers in a single episode.  And our detective team of Jackson and Lola seem even smarter than in the first episode, or at least Jackson did.  Lola is revealed as a druggie, which may compromise her work (or maybe not, if we believe what Freud said about at least one drug in his Cocaine Papers).

But the point is that these two teams are pretty evenly matched in terms of wits, verve, and how they support and energize each other.  Which means we should be in for a good chess match in this series.

Significantly, the good guys at this point are pretty far along in realizing who the bad guys are.  The question, then, is what Freddy and Baba will do to evade being put out of business by the police.  Their formula, developed tonight, of killing someone to make him look the suspect, won't be able to last much longer - Lola's already on to them.

So what will they do?   Both killers think pretty well on their feet, and Freddy in her own way is a master strategist.  I predict that the narrative will soon take a dangerous turn, as either Jackson or Lola or both become hunted by Freddy and Baba.   I'll be back here tomorrow night, when the third episode is on, to tell you how this hunter and prey switching roles works out, assuming that's what happens.

 


Lovecraft Country 1.1: Racist Police Get Horror Comeuppance



Finally had a chance to watch the debut of Lovecraft Country on HBO.   I was pulled away this past week by the Democratic National Convention, televised and virtual and truly inspiring.  And it was oddly appropriate that I did not look at Lovecraft Country until just a few nights before the upcoming Republican convention, which begins on Monday.  Creepily appropriate, because Lovecraft Country is a tableau of racism and horror, and that's pretty much what I expect to find in the Republican National Convention.  Would be nice if that meant I didn't need to watch any of those four blustering nights.

I know, it may not be good style to mix real politics and popular culture, but times have changed.  H. P. Lovecraft was a real author of horror, and a real racist.  Since I'm no fan of horror, I've never read much of Stephen King, whose progressivism is in an accord with mine.  So I certainly didn't bother with Lovecraft, and always found mentions of his Cthulhu at science fiction conventions mildly annoying.  

To make matters worse -- worse for my being anything like a knowledgeable reviewer of Lovecraft Country -- I haven't read Matt Ruff's 2016 novel by the same name, which explores the mix of horror and racism in a narrative whose hero Atticus Turner is an African-American devotee of pulp science fiction that flourished along with racism in the first half or so of the 20th century.  But I've always held that reviews of television and cinema by people who haven't read the novels are a necessary part of the critical process, because they can evaluate the movie or TV show on its own terms, rather than in comparison to the novel or short story.

So what did I think of the first episode of Lovecraft Country?  I liked it a lot.  It was fun seeing the racist murderous police get their comeuppance by another H. P. Lovecraft monster, the Shoggoth.   That was a fine metaphoric fulfillment of Atticus's appreciation of bug-eyed monster science fiction.   The genre is intrinsically a celebration of the unlikely hero, and it's a cool twist to make the genre itself a component of the heroism in this story.

I was asked a few weeks ago by Elizabeth Yuko, writing an article for Reader's Digest,  to offer an example of a science fiction novel that accurately predicted the future.  I offered Isaac Asimov's Foundation trilogy (to see why, here's the Reader's Digest article).  If Reader's Digest ever asks me to choose a horror novel that got the future right, I might well choose Ruff's Lovecraft Country, as a strong metaphoric example of racist police getting just what they deserve.

But I'll try to watch the rest of the HBO series first, which by the way has good acting by Jonathan Majors as Atticus, and Jurnee Smollett and Courtney B. Vance in other lead roles.

See also Lovecraft Country 1.2: Malleable Dreams

 


Thursday, August 20, 2020

Written Report on Fourth Day of 2020 Democratic National Convention

And the 2020 Democratic National Convention concluded tonight, very likely the most important political convention in our American history, because it nominated candidates for President and Vice President for what in many ways is the most important election in our history, upcoming in November.  Why so important?  Because it's the last and only chance to vote out of office a President who is the biggest threat to our democracy in history, Donald Trump.

This convention, as you know, was conducted virtually.   The reason, as you also know, was safety, with the COVID-19 pandemic still raging across America.  This would have been a very necessary compromise.  But I thought it came off so well, the virtual convention was in many ways so much better than the in-person convention,  that it thus was not only no compromise, but something, or parts of which, that should be done again, and become part of the basic structure of how conventions to nominate Presidents of our country are conducted and presented to our nation.

The virtual convention was better, I thought, in at least two ways.  First, the sequences of people across America, in the nomination roll call, in the endorsements and nominations, in the people talking about their struggles with racism, the pandemic, and their businesses, were the best way I've seen of putting substance to the "We, the people," the first words of our Constitution that were  adopted as the motto of this 2020 Democratic National Convention.

Second, I think talking into a camera in a quiet hall or room made for better speeches by the major speakers.  Part of the reason why I thought everyone from Bernie  to Obama and Joe Biden gave the best speeches of their careers was the clarity and intensity that the camera rather than a huge crowd affords the speaker.  I'm not sure this kind of speech making will continue when COVID subsides.  I hope it does.

The Democrats, at least in my lifetime, have always been the Party of the future, so it's only fitting that they trail-blazed a new way of conducting conventions in this age of COVID-19.

Now as to the content of this final night of the 2020 Democratic National Convention, it had many splendid, memorable moments, many of them bringing tears to the eyes and hope to the soul.  I thought the rivals segment was especially effective.  Julia Louis-Dreyfus as host of the entire evening was not only emotionally satisfying but laugh-out-out funny.  And the teenage boy in New Hampshire who stutters, and who explained how Joe Biden, who also stutters but has largely gotten on top of it, gave him some helpful advice was ... well, courageous and inspiring only do it partial justice.

And Joe Biden ... well, yes, he too indeed delivered the speech of his life.  Summoning all of America to join him in the battle ahead to reclaim America, and then set it on a better path. The great speeches earlier in the convention were delivered by people like Barack Obama who had delivered many an inspirational and eloquent speech before.   But I've never heard Joe Biden deliver anything like what he said tonight, masterfully written and masterfully delivered, in equal measure.

I can barely imagine, and don't particularly want to imagine, what the Republicans will do next week at their convention.  I can imagine the America that Joe Biden so powerfully described, and I'll do all in my power in the months ahead to help make that happen.

See also Written Report on 1st Night the 2020 Democratic National Convention ... Written Report on 2nd Night of the 2020 Democratic National Convention ... Written Report on 3rd Night of the 2020 Democratic National Convention


Podcast Report on Third Day of 2020 Democratic National Convention


Welcome to Light On Light Through, Episode 140, in which I offer my assessment of the third night of the 2020 Democratic National Convention.

Further reading (my blog):

 


Check out this episode!

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

Written Report on 3rd Day of 2020 Democratic National Convention

What a speech by Barack Obama on the third night of the 2020 Democratic National Convention, the first virtual National Democratic or Republican Convention in history.  I thought the speech was so pertinent and powerful it was even better than his speeches as President, and in his campaigns for that office.  Unafraid to call out the monster, the would-be destroyer of our democracy, now in the White House.  Sobering, inspiring, chilling, and so very necessary.

Kamala Harris gave an outstanding speech, too, accepting her nomination as Vice President on the Democratic ticket.  Her empathy for the victims of racism and COVID, combined with her astute attack on Trump, and her winning charm, show what a wise choice Joe Biden made in selecting her as his running mate.  And wasn't it excellent to see him come out on stage and join her after her speech, especially impressive in this age of COVID.

Elizabeth Warren's speech was powerful, as well, preceded by real people across the country whose businesses have been jeopardized to the edge of extinction by the COVID pandemic and the poor leadership -- non-leadership -- of Donald Trump.   I hope she gets a prominent position in Biden's cabinet.

And the segment on victims of gun violence, followed by Gabby Giffords, was also ever timely and necessary.  Good for the Democratic National Committee for not letting this life-and-death issue get lost in the toxic sea of COVID and racism and attempts to suppress the vote that beset all Americans. 

So this third night was a real joy and inspiration.  Biggest surprise for me: Mariska Hargitay of Law & Order SVU endorsing Biden for President!  You just can't beat a Benson endorsement!

I'll see you back here tomorrow after the fourth and final night of the 2020 Democratic National Convention.



See also Written Report on 1st Night the 2020 Democratic National Convention ... Written Report on 2nd Night of the 2020 Democratic National Convention


Podcast Report on Second Day of 2020 Democratic National Convention


Welcome to Light On Light Through, Episode 139, in which I offer my assessment of the second night of the 2020 Democratic National Convention.

Further reading (my blog):

Report on the 2020 Democratic National Convention, Day 2


Check out this episode!

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

Written Report on 2nd Day of 2020 Democratic National Convention

I thought the second day of the 2020 Democratic National Convention, totally virtual, and just concluded on television, hit an emotional tone which was at once as deep as it gets, and hopeful.  The casting of the nominating ballots, state by state, in alphabetical order, was especially moving and satisfying, a much better multi-faceted picture of America than could ever be offered in an in-person physical convention, because we actually got to see the states and cities across this country from which the delegates, multicultural, colorfully dressed and spoken, were casting their votes.

It was also good to see Joe Biden himself at critical moments in the convention, as we did last night.  Tonight he accepted the nomination, spoke with people who survived because of the Affordable Health Care Act, which he helped bring over the finish line with Obama, and came out to hug his wife Jill after her speech.  This was something you also didn't see, or didn't see much of, in the traditional old-fashioned in-person conventions.  (Right, I'm increasingly thinking of those in-person conventions as old-fashioned.)

I also thought the segment of Biden working with John McCain and other Republicans was very effective.  Whatever McCain did that was right or wrong in the Senate, his saving of the Affordable Care Act from the Trumpian onslaught will be remembered for a long time in history.

And Jill Biden's talk, and its analogy of making a family whole (what she did when she married Joe Biden) and making a nation whole (what Joe and she will do once they're in the White House), was just the tonic we needed.

As a parting note, it was great to see Caroline Kennedy and her son Jack Schlossberg, looking a lot like his uncle John Kennedy, Jr. and he has the same bearing as his grandfather JFK.  There's no going back to Camelot, but Jack may well play a role in building the new and better America in the decades ahead.

See also Report on the 2020 Democratic National Convention, Day 1 ... Report on the 2020 Democratic National Convention, Day 3



Podcast Report on First Day of 2020 Democratic National Convention


Welcome to Light On Light Through, Episode 138, in which I offer my assessment of the first night of the 2020 Democratic National Convention.

Further reading (my blog)

Report on 2020 Democratic National Convention, Day 1


Check out this episode!

Monday, August 17, 2020

Written Report on 1st Day of 2020 Democratic National Convention

I thought the first night of the 2020 Democratic National Convention, the first virtual convention ever held, was truly effective.   Not only because of what the well-known speakers said, which was passionate and true and highly effective, but also because of several speakers I don't recall seeing before at any national political convention.

Probably the best of these not-yet-famous people, certainly what moved me the most, was what Kristin Urquiza said.  Her father, a Trump supporter, died of COVID.  His only pre-condition, Ms. Urquiza said, "was that he trusted Donald Trump".  That statement not only rings true to the soul, but shows that Ms. Urquiza has a future in the political world, if she wants it.

Now to some of the people we already knew.  I thought Bernie Sanders gave the best speech of his life tonight.  He spoke plain truth to his millions of supporters, which didn't include me.  But every word he said made eminent sense.  His confessions of a progressive -- his confessions about why he was supporting Joe Biden for President -- should be a handbook for every rational person.  In a phrase, they explained the dangers of Trump (which we already know), but also how Biden's positions take important steps towards what Sanders wants, most importantly universal health care.  I hope those points become known and are believed by every progressive.

I thought the Republicans supporting Trump were convincing, and, for some reason, even more so Biden's rivals in the Democratic Primary, like Bernie.  In addition, the more moderate Amy Klobuchar continues to impress as one of the most sensible thinkers and speakers in America.   Andrew Cuomo didn't run for President this year.  But his dealing with the COVID pandemic in New York -- we now have just a one-percent infection rate in this state, after starting out as the most infected state in country -- was masterful, including his daily briefings (which I said at the time were akin to FDR's fireside chats during the Great Depression).  His speech tonight followed in that tradition.

And then there's Michelle Obama.  She already ascended to being far more than a former First Lady.  But tonight she hit new heights, of passion, compassion, and just clear common sense.  Her speech was a pleasure and an inspiration to hear, and I hope that it gets everyone who voted for Barack to vote for Biden this time around.   Her plea that we should vote as if our lives depended on it was never more true.

And I'll be back here tomorrow with thoughts on what tomorrow's segment of the 2020 Democratic National Convention brings.




See also Report on the 2020 Democratic National Convention, Day 2 ... Report on the 2020 Democratic National Convention, Day 3

London Kills: Storyline and Characters that Kill



My wife and I binge-watched another two-season U.K. offering from Acorn TV: London Kills.  It's been billed as akin to Criminal Minds and Castle, but, episode for episode (five per-season for this mini-series), I liked it better than either of those fine shows.  How's that for praise?

Like Striking Out, another Acorn gem with two seasons that I just reviewed here yesterday, London Kills combines individual murder investigations in an episodic format, with a continuing story that spans the two seasons: DI David Bradford's wife Sarah has gone missing.  He commands a four-person unit consisting of DS Vivienne Cole (don't call her Viv!), DC Rob Brady, and TDC Billie Fitzgerald (I just love those U.K. police detective ranks: Detective Inspector, Detective Sergeant, Detective Constable, Trainee Detective Constable), who must decide if Sarah is dead or missing, and, ultimately in logical analysis, if she is dead, did Bradford kill her?

The characters are well-drawn and distinctive.  They all have minds of their own.  But Cole is by-the-book, Brady's strong suit is loyalty, and Fitzgerald is the most empathetic.   Bradford has all of those elements in his persona, all of which are filtered through the torment he feels about his missing wife, amplified by a troubled step-daughter who thinks he murdered her mother Sarah and a psycho who knew too much about what happened to Sarah.  

The cast is more than up for the narrative and roles, and put in memorable performances across the board (Hugo Speer as Bradford, Sharon Small as Cole, Bailey Patrick, who was good in The Nest, too, as Brady, and Tori Allen-Martin as Fitzgerald).  Unlike Striking Out, it looks like there's every chance there will be a third season, and I'll stop watching whatever else I may be viewing and switch to the third season of London Kills.

 

Sunday, August 16, 2020

Striking Out: A Solid Hit



My wife and I binged the two seasons of Striking Out, originally (in 2017-2018) on Irish TV, now on Acorn via Amazon Prime.  The show only ran two seasons, and there's apparently no prospect for a third season, which is a shame, because the two seasons were quite good, and the second season ended on an unexpected turn of events.

The set-up of the show is something we've seen before: a happily married or about to be happily married woman comes home to find her man happily going at it in bed with another woman.   In the case of Striking Out, Tara and Eric, the about-to-be-married happy couple, both are attorneys, who work in Eric father's firm, and just for good measure, Tara's father is an attorney, too.  Lots of possibilities there, and the narrative is especially enjoyable to see because it all takes place in Dublin, a sight for sore eyes in these our current COVID-beset times.

But the stories are good, too, and come in two kinds.  One is episodic, as Tara struggles to establish her own practice, and takes this unusual case and that.  The other narrative is continuing, and delves into what's going on in Eric's father's firm.  It's under investigation, by some kind of independent prosecutor who is both brilliant and drinks too much, and whom Tara comes to sometimes work with, which adds further provocative permutations to the story.

The acting is excellent.  Amy Huberman plays an appealing Tara, wounded, powerful, loving, and funny.  The supporting cast features Moe Dunford (Vikings), Neil Morrissey (Line of Duty), and Maria Doyle Kennedy and Nick Dunning from The Tudors, so how can you go wrong?  The only thing wrong about Striking Out is that there's no third season, so here's a final plea for one in case anyone who can make that happen is reading this.

 

Saturday, August 15, 2020

Podcast: Defending the Postal Service


Welcome to Light On Light Through, Episode 137, in which I explain why I think we Americans must do everything in our power to defend the US Postal Service from the current, all-out Trumpian attack.

Further reading (my blog post):

Defending the Postal Service


Check out this episode!

Blog Post: Defending the Postal Service

It seems strange to have to write in defense of the U. S. Postal Service, but it's a measure of the depravity of the man in the White House, and how far he's willing to go in his flailing attempt to win another term in office.  Removing sorting machines, removing mailboxes, doing whatever he can to gum up the works of  a service that everyone loves and has never been more essential in this our age of the COVID-19 pandemic and the upcoming Presidential election.   An election which could well determine the fate and future of democracy in this country.  An election which the person now in office will do anything to win,

It didn't start with COVID-19 and this build-up to the election.  Trump's hatred of Jeff Bezos, who created Amazon, became a billionaire, and bought The Washington Post, one of Trump's most effective critics, led him as early as 2018 to attack the Post Office,  Its crime?  It gave Amazon a good, special rate, a smart move both for Amazon and the Postal Service.

Trump's pretext back then in 2018 was that giving Amazon such a good special rate was bad business for the Postal Service.  But like Amtrak which is also often starving for funds, the Postal Service isn't and was never intended to be a profit-making business.  It is a governmental service provided to the people.  And in the case of the Postal Service, it is a service provided for in our Constitution.

But Trump now has a better reason to starve the Postal Service.  He wants to eliminate mail-in ballots, especially necessary in these COVID times, because he thinks (and polls say) that they will be used by Democratic more than Republican voters. (If we want to entertain a maybe only slightly paranoid explanation, perhaps Trump wants to handcuff the Postal Service because the Russians have told him they haven't come up with a way to hack votes cast through the mail). But whatever his reasoning, crippling the Postal Service is one of the things Trump is doing to win an election which current polls show him badly losing. Attacking the media, lying so often that keeping count is a bad joke, are no longer enough.  The fascistic impulse dictates an escalation of tactics.  Dampen, crush the democratic expression by physical means.  Send Federal troops or whatever exactly are into the streets.  Get in the way of people exercising their right to vote.

There are things we the people can do to oppose this.  Shine a light on it.  Pressure our state governments to provide alternate, safe means of casting ballots, like collection boxes.  But also support our Postal Service in whatever ways we can.   They are not only the carriers of our mail, of birthday cards and holiday greetings that we cherish, but now more than ever are carriers of our democracy.

And some people, who like Jeff Bezos are billionaires, can do even more.  If Bezos, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Michael Bloomberg, and Warren Buffet each donated a couple of billion dollars to the Postal Service, that could well enable it to stay whole and functioning through the election.   Fascism triumphs by undermining democratic institutions, eroding the foundations of freedom.   First the press, now the Postal Service, anything that conveys our freedom.   We have a chance to stop this, reverse this, in less than three months.  We have to do all in our power to keep that beleaguered arena for freedom open.






Thursday, August 13, 2020

Anne Reburn and Her Clones



No, this is not a review of a new science movie I just caught on Netflix, though it could have been, a few years ago, before the explosion in video technology and savvy which has created on whole new genre of music video now lighting up YouTube.  Covers have been a staple of YouTube since it came into our lives in 2006, but now they're being done, of Beatles and Beachboy songs and records by slightly lesser known artists, by just one person, singing all the parts and sometimes even playing all the instruments.  They're all always fun to see and listen to, but Anne Reburn's, with what she refers to as her "clones," are in a class by themselves.  The handful that I've seen so far are just fabulous, on all kinds of levels.

Reburn has a nice voice and a keen sense of harmony.  But she and her clones (i.e., different takes of her) invest the videos with an infectious sensual energy, a sense of humor ranging from cute to delightful, and a series of facial expressions which are irresistible.  More than that, the different versions of herself, singing different parts, show off these expressions at different and just the right times in the performance.  In addition, she makes sure that she is always connected to the audience.  In her cover (which already has well over a million views) at the top of this post of Roy Orbison's final hit, "You Got It," Anne or one of her clones -- whatever the others may be doing -- always manages, sweetly and seductively, to look at the camera, i.e, the audience.  No wonder you can't take your eyes off the screen.  

Years ago, my first published article in a scholarly journal, Toy, Mirror, and Art: The Metamorphosis of Technological Culture in 1977, observed that as a given technology develops, it moves from being a toy (people like to play with it, just for the kick of seeing what the new technology does) to being a mirror (reflecting some art or whatever already out there), to creating art in itself.  YouTube has long been in the mirror phase -- a great place to watch and listen to your favorite recording artists.  Anne Reburn's work -- and props are due to Luke Manning, who produced the brilliant video of Anne's ELO cover, "Don't Bring Me Down," which you can watch right after this text -- is a joyous proclamation that YouTube has ascended to the art level, in singers and musicians covering other artists.

Anne already has more than sixty covers up on YouTube, and I'm looking forward to watching all of them.  She's also starting to post some good original material on Spotify.  I expect we'll be seeing and hearing a lot more of her exuberant, angelic work in the future.




Wednesday, August 12, 2020

Podcast: Kamala Harris: The First Step Back from the Precipice


Welcome to Light On Light Through, Episode 136, in which I explain why I think Joe Biden's selection of Kamala Harris as his running mate is America's first step back from the precipice.

Further reading (my blog post):

Kamala Harris: First Step Back from the Precipice


Check out this episode!

Blog Post: Kamala Harris: The First Step Back from the Precipice



I wrote a few days ago (and also posted a podcast) about why I strongly disagreed with Wade Davis's conclusion, in "The Unraveling of America" in Rolling Stone, that America was so far gone, in ways that the abysmal treatment of the COVID-19 pandemic epitomizes but didn't initiate, that nothing could reverse that decline.  Nothing, including and especially, the upcoming Presidential election.  I explained why I thought such a conclusion was not only dangerous but wrong, and cited FDR's election in 1932 as a ringing example of how a Presidential election can indeed make a difference, in that case, lifting us out of Great Depression, and enabling us to the lead the free world to defeat the Nazis.

I offered that argument two days before Joe Biden selected Kamala Harris to be his VP running mate.  I see that selection as America, via Joe Biden's wise decision, taking the first step back from the precipice.  In an ideal world, a person's ethnicity and gender wouldn't matter.  All that would count in anyone's being a candidate for any job, would be the candidate's talent and capacity to do the job as effectively and as excellently as the job could be done.  But we don't yet live in such an ideal world, and, in order to get there, we need people in public positions who come from ethnicities and genders (i.e., women) who have been shut out from such public positions, because of the racism and sexism from which our free society emerged, and which is still very much with us.  In such a world - which is this, our world, our country - Kamala Harris breaks an wide array of barriers, an array amazing for one person.  She is an African-American woman, with an Indian (Asian Indian) heritage.

But Kamala Harris would be an impressive candidate even if she were a white man.  She is articulate, sharp as whip, reflective, passionate, and strategic in her thinking.  She is an ideal balance for the more deliberative Biden, and will make an ideal governing partner when they both get into office.   (Note added: If you want an idea of how Harris stands up to the current Vice President, compare her heartwarming speech of a fighter, just delivered in Wilmington, Delaware after Joe Biden introduced her, to the unctuous pap that daily comes out of Pence's mouth.)

So, to return to Davis, elections do make a difference.  A Democrat in the White House, with a black woman as his Vice President, and a Senate and House of Representatives in Democratic control, can and will turn this country around.   But to make that happen, we have to get out and vote.



Monday, August 10, 2020

Rebecka Martinsson: Two Very Different, But Excellent, Seasons

 



My wife and I just binged two seasons of Rebecka Martinsson on Acorn via Prime Video, and loved it.  The narrative takes in the northern-most town of Sweden, Kiruna.  Rebecka comes from there, is working in Stockholm when the series begins, and goes back home, changing from being a high-class corporate lawyer to a country prosecutor.   The transformation is not easy for her - her mother committed suicide and her father died in a car accident.  She does find love there - but not easily - and a great group of police to work with.

But before I tell you anything more, here's a kicker:  Ida Engvoll plays Rebecka in the first season (see's in the picture above).  She brings an incredible combination of sweetness, spunk, evanescence, and melancholy to the role.  And ... she's gone in the second season.  Sascha Zacharias, who played a minor character in the first season, plays Rebecka in the second.  And she does a pretty good job, but ...

I read somewhere that Truffaut or Godard or some legendary French filmmaker once fired an actress in the middle of a movie and hired someone else to play her character.  He said the audience would never notice.  I have no idea if they did.  But I do recall when Dallas the TV series brought in a new actress to play Miss Ellie (Donna Reed replaced Barbara Bel Geddes) and that was a complete travesty.  I have no idea why Rebecka Martinsson took such a risk.   And though I very much enjoyed the second season, I missed Engvoll.

By the way, Rebecka Martinsson, a propos its location, is very much Nordic Noir - with a vengeance.  Major, likeable characters are prone to die, and, jeez, a little baby is frozen to death in a backseat of a car.  But that's leavened with wisecracks and repartee - the best coming from Anna Maria Mella, a chief detective or whatever the Swedish title, very well played by Eva Melander - and the scenery is downright breathtaking.

We'll definitely be watching the third season.  I just hope the producers don't pull another Dallas on us.

 


We Hunt Together 1.1: Compelling Pairs

 

A different kind of detective show, just on Showtime: We Hunt Together.

How is it different?  British - well, there are lots of those.  Somewhat unusual format: About equal time to the build-up to a murder, that happens three days before the detectives begin to investigate.  That's interesting, but not enough to make We Hunt Together compelling.

Here's what does: the characters, who come in pairs, a man and a woman, who do the murder, and a man and woman who investigate.  In both cases, the men are black.   In the case of the killers, he's seeking some sort of refugee status in the UK, from Africa.  He has both a gentleness and a violent streak.  His partner in crime is a blonde, who works as a telephone sex operator, in at least one of her jobs.  As for the detectives, the guy is gentle, too.  His partner, the woman, is something of a hard-ass, or at least more seasoned in homicide investigations.  He, by the way, is her boss, That, to me, is an interesting set of characters, who have a shot at being compelling.

The ambience is evocative, too - gritty, smoky, boozy, druggy.  Someone who sounds like Amy Winehouse (and for all I know, is) sings "Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow" as the murderers dance, and the song plays under (or is it over?) the closing credits.   One of the best applications I've heard of that Goffin and King masterpiece.

So I'm in - at least to the extent that I'd watch the next episode of We Hunt Together tomorrow, but I'll settle for next week, and tell you sooner or later if I love it.

See also We Hunt Together 1.2: Upping the Game ... We Hunt Together 1.3: Fine Tuning

 



Sunday, August 9, 2020

Into the Night: The Lethal Sun





In the old days, they used to have something called B-movies. They were intended to accompany the A-movie, the main attraction, in the double features that played in neighborhood movie houses, before television came along and ate their lunch and closed them down. Many of those B-movies were quite enjoyable, but they weren’t exactly Oscar material. I don’t think there were any B-television shows, certainly none on cable and none on Netflix, Amazon video, and other streaming services. But if ever there were a streaming television series that felt like a B-movie – in this case, a six-episode movie serial – it would be Into the Night, which started on Netflix in May 2020.

The set-up is quite simple: our sun has turned lethal, literally. A band of hapless, but fortunately talented, people end up on a plane hijacked in Brussels. It has a pilot, wounded in the hijacking, who is fortunately still able to fly his plane, before the deadly morning sun arrives. The challenge: fly west, or further into the night, and avoid the sun – as well as their own dangerous impulses – until they can find a safe place to shelter, if there is one left on the planet. To add more interest, the passengers all come with serious psychological baggage of one kind or another. And to add insult to injury, the murderous sunlight also ruins the food, making oranges taste like “chalk,” and other fruit like “toilet paper”.

The premise, that the sun’s out-of-whack polarity has made its rays into killers, has zero scientific plausibility, so far as I know. So how, then, did I come to very much enjoy this series? I’m reminded of what my late and great editor at Tor Books, David Hartwell, once told me about readers of science fiction: they will accept a total of one big preposterous element in your story, and if you’re rigorous in adhering to your premise and its implications for the rest of your narrative, they can still love your work. Into the Night is often riveting proof that the same pertains to binging a science fiction television series.

My favorite part of the series was its intrinsically, blatantly European flavor. The language is French (with English subtitles) – one of the two languages officially spoken in Belgium – and the major characters are Belgian, Italian, Turkish, and Russian; even some Scottish accents play a supportive role. There are bad guys and good guys of both genders, spurts of heroism, altruism, cleverness, as well as sheer selfishness and stupidity. In addition to the life-and-death context that propels the entire narrative, there are ample micro life-and-death situations that the individual characters find themselves in, and this makes Into the Night tough to stop watching. I watched all six episodes in one sitting.

And as I was watching, I was thinking that, given that this series takes place on the very edge of the end of the world, our time of the harrowing pandemic off-screen makes this an ideal time to watch Into the Night. Is there any research in psychology to the effect that during the time of a global crisis, watching a story about an even worse kind of global crisis is a good way to kind of get your mind off the real one? I don’t know, but I wouldn’t be surprised if that was a contributing factor in why I enjoyed the series.

I hadn’t laid eyes on any of the actors before, and had never heard of either the book on which the series is based, The Old Axolotl, the 2015 novel by Polish author Jacek Dukaj (translated into English in 2017), or of the “creator” of the series, Jason George, who also gets the writing credit. That writing, by the way, is actually pretty sharp, and sometimes serves up a winning hipness and humor; as when one character, trying to buck up another character’s desperate attempt to bring a plane safely down on a runway with no prior piloting experience, while using a YouTube tutorial, tells her, “If we land, I’ll leave a good review.” The first-time pilot, Sylvie, has the most compelling backstory, and is well played by Pauline Etienne. All right, I guess I’ll admit that most of the other characters have interesting backstories, too, though in aggregate this band brought together against the apocalypse, cut off from the world they have no chance of saving, seem a tad too familiar, maybe because they remind me of Lost.

But the ending leaves plenty of room for a sequel, and I’ll be happy to see it.

First published in my new column, The Other Reel, in Future SF, July 2020.

 


Podcast: Why I Think America Is Not Permanently Unraveling


Welcome to Light On Light Through, Episode 135, in which I rebut Wade Davis's claim in a recent essay in Rolling Stone that America's decline is irreversible.

Further reading

 


Check out this episode!

Blog Post: Why I Disagree about "The Unraveling of America"

Canadian anthropologist Wade Davis posted a savvy article in Rolling Stone, entitled The Unraveling of America.*  Its thesis that America's generally atrocious handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, under our "buffoon of a president," laid bare a decay and decline that already was well underway, in racism and income inequality, is well-evidenced and well-argued, and undeniable.   But I disagree with Davis on two important points, one historical, the other up and coming.

1.  Davis says Americans elected Trump.  That's not quite the case.  Hillary Clinton won the popular vote by three million votes over Trump, which means Americans elected her not Trump president.  It was the antiquated, anti-democratic Electoral College - our inane way of electing a President - that put Trump in office.

2.  Davis concludes by observing that "even should Trump be resoundingly defeated [in November], it’s not at all clear that such a profoundly polarized nation will be able to find a way forward. For better or for worse, America has had its time."  I agree that the future is always opaque, or not at all clear. But it follows that I don't see it as a certainty that "America has had its time".  If the Democrats take back the White House and the Senate, the United States could have a progressive government akin to what FDR had in the 1930s.

That government, back then, got us out of the Great Depression, and then went on to crush the Nazis.  It did that, even though America still suffered from racism, sexism, and extreme income inequality, in just all about ways worse than ours.  It did that with a far less effective community-building media system than we have now -- i.e., no television and no Internet.  I think there's every reason to think that the election of Joe Biden to the Presidency, and a Democratic majority to the Senate, could indeed reverse most of the damage that Trump has done, and result in America being a better leader of the world than it ever was. 

But all of that depends on Americans getting out and voting or mailing out their ballots in November.

*Thanks John Fraim for bringing this essay to my attention.


Thursday, August 6, 2020

Podcast: Three Absentias


Welcome to Light On Light Through, Episode 134, in which I review the three seasons so far of Absentia.

Read the reviews in this blog:

  1. Absentia 1: In Your Face and Worth Watching
  2. Absentia 2: Even More There than the First Season
  3. Absentia 3: Adrenalin and Relevance

Check out this episode!

Absentia 3: Adrenalin and Relevance



The third season of Absentia was up on Amazon Prime Video last month.  I liked it the best of the three seasons so far because, well, I like James Bond type stories more than a vanished member of the family comes home after six years of missing, even if she is a high-powered FBI agent.

The new season picks up right after the second season ended, and quickly pitches us into international espionage and subterfuge, with a searingly all-too-currently relevant theme: the bad guys want to unleash a virus upon the world, with a view towards getting rich distributing an antidote which they also have in their possession.   It turns out that Emily was missing for six years because she was kidnapped by this group, which also has other (maybe) related bio "research" at work, including (I think) developing some kind of super-warrior army they can use.

I'm putting in those provisos - "maybe," "I think" - because these connections are still not brought into completely clear focus.  But that's ok, because the action is so quick and powerful you barely have time to think about the ultimate underpinnings.   There's also an excellent development of characters, in Emily's family and beyond.  In the first two seasons, her brother played an important role.  He plays a somewhat significant role again, but not as much as Emily's father Warren and her son Flynn, very well played by Paul Freeman and Patrick McAuley.  Let's hear it for multi-generation de facto commandos!

Nick also plays a very different role in this third season, becoming the one who's kidnapped, in absentia, pursued relentlessly by Emily.  She's helped by Cal, a not completely trustworthy partner, at least not by Emily, but very effective fighting for her and alongside her.  One of my favorite scenes is how the two get the drop on a group of brutal bad guys and throw them off a hurtling train in the middle of Europe.  Stana Katic is just great as Emily, as is Patrick Heusinger as Nick and Matthew Le Nevez as Cal.

Speaking of Europe, most of the action takes place in Austria and Germany, and the combination of that and the labs filled with experimented-upon bodies adds a definite Nazi flavor to this.   I found that both appropriate and a welcome departure from ISIS or Russia being the root of the villainy.  Indeed, immigrants from the Middle East are preyed upon by the nefarious bio-tech operation, and they emerge as heroes in this story, with Rafiq (well played by Adam Hussain) working with Nick and Emily to free his mother and the other prisoners from the sinister labs.

I give Absentia 3 my highest recommendation, for its non-stop action, social relevance, human relationships, and espionage puzzles.  And back to that Bondian quality that I like: it even has a memorable villain enforcer, Dawkins, played just right by Geoff Bell.



 

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Fearless: Yes, and Boundless



Shows about lawyers defending clients wrongly accused of murder are a dime a dozen, on both sides of the Atlantic.  So are espionage shows in the U. K., in which the Americans are the bad guys.  Fearless had both of these characteristics.  The opening credits feature Margaret Thatcher, who was best friends with Reagan; Tony Blair, who supported Bush's ill-conceived attack on Iraq; and even Donald Trump, who is a dangerous lunatic in just about any book.  But the British lawyer, Emma Banfield, was played by Helen McCrory, who was great on Peaky Blinders, so how could I resist watching this 2017 mini-series?

And I'm glad I did.  As Banfield defends her client, Kevin, stewing in jail for a murder he didn't commit because he confessed to it, she and we unravel a complex plot with twists and turns and complexities that will keep you guessing until near the very end.   And, yes, although the Americans are mostly behind it, at least the lead American, Heather, is played by an American actress, Robin Weigert (all too often in these British shows you have an American character played by a British actor doing his best Robert Mitchum impersonation).   And you also have characters undergoing refreshing and justified transformations, such as an opponent turning into an essential and reliable ally.

But the heart of the series is McCory's performance as Banfield, who manages to be tough as nails but always vulnerable, and at the same time.  Or, to shift the metaphor, Banfield wears her heart on her sleeve all the time, even when she steps into the ring, which is also all of the time.  That takes a lot of skill to pull off - in acting as well as reality - and McCrory does a fine job of it.

So is there a second season, with another exploit for Banfield, and further development of her difficult life?   Well, there should be, but I can't find it.  So I'll end this by making my customary plea to Netflix, Prime Video, and Hulu: pick this is up, if the original bankrollers are not up to it.   Emma Banfield is a memorable character, and we'd like to see more of her.

 

InfiniteRegress.tv