Chuck Todd interviews me about alternate histories
Showing posts with label We Are the World. Show all posts
Showing posts with label We Are the World. Show all posts

Sunday, February 4, 2024

The Greatest Night in Pop: The Making of 'We Are the World'



There's almost nothing as satisfying on the screen as seeing a documentary that shows you how something else you saw and on the screen and loved was put together.  The Greatest Night in Pop does that with the 1985 video and recording, "We Are the World".  In part because our family was just getting started, in part because we cared about feeding people in need of food, in part because we were fans of so many of the artists who made that music, the video has been among my wife's and my favorites since the day we first saw it in March 1985.  It still brings tears to our eyes.  As did The Greatest Night in Pop documentary, many times.

As we were watching it on Netflix the other night, I realized what an important kind of new video and recording the 1985 performance brought into being.  Not a concert of great artists, but a single song performed by great artists.  The performance of George Harrison's "As My Guitar Gently Weeps" in the 2004 Rock 'n' Roll Hall of Fame inductions with Tom Petty, Stevie Winwood, and Prince (who delivers the best guitar playing I've ever seen) is even better than the Beatles' original recording, and owes a debt of gratitude to the way "We Are the World" brought together more than two score of artists nearly two decades earlier to make such eternal music.

Prince didn't make it to that recording, though he was very much desired, and The Greatest Night in Pop tells us at least a part of that story.  It also shows how Dylan, not really getting how he fit in the recording, sung his part perfectly after Stevie Wonder did a good mimic of Dylan singing like Dylan had in his heyday in the 1960s.  Cyndi Lauper, understandably nervous in the company of such greats, belts out a great line and ends with a "yeah, yeah, yeah".  She wonders if that was ok and is assured by Quincy Jones that it was just right.  The key of the song was of course right for some of the singers but not for everyone.  Bruce Springsteen, coming to the recording session with a hoarse voice just after a tour, sounds like he has "broken glass" in his throat, as someone remarks.  But it's just right for the subject of the recording.  Michael Jackson, who co-wrote the song with Lionel Richie, wants to add a "sha-la-la" to the chorus.  Smokey Robinson tells us in current time, when the documentary was recorded, how he had lots of experience working with Michael Jackson at Motown, and we see him walk up to Jackson in the "We Are the World" recording studio and talk him out of the "sha-la-la".  Diana Ross says how much she loved Daryl Hall's singing.  Who knew?

The Greatest Night in Pop is a treasure-trove of such nuggets of musical history.  I expect my wife and I will be watching it a lot more than once.









Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Myopic Critique of the New "We Are the World"

One of the most short-sighted critiques  I've seen in a long time is the one concerning whether the new "We Are the World" should have been made.   Jay-Z is being widely quoted as saying that the original 1985 version is so good, so peerless, that he doesn't "ever wanna see it touched".

I can understand the feeling.  I still cringe a little every time I hear someone other than the Beatles do a Beatles song, anyone other than the Supremes try "You Can't Hurry Love."   This applies to movies, too.  The remakes of "The Getaway" and "The Manchurian Candidate" don't hold a candle to the originals.

And there's no doubt that the original "We Are the World" is much better than the current remake - better in incandescent artists, for sure.   Who can compare with Ray Charles, Michael Jackson, Bob Dylan, Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Stevie Wonder, the list goes on and on.

But that's not the point, is it.   The point of both "We Are the Worlds" was to focus attention on and raise money for highly worthy causes.    If the new "We Are the World" is only good, or even great, in comparison to the 1985 version which was greater, actually, the greatest, why should whatever good the new version can do be eliminated?

There is pain, hurt, evil in the world aplenty.   The forces of light have all they can do to keep the flood of darkness at the gates.   Why turn away a valuable ally, even it's lesser than the original?

It's often said the good is the enemy of the great - meaning that selection of the good can preempt or shortcircuit the great.    But the maxim does not apply in this case.    The new "We Are the World" in no way diminishes the original - if anything, it calls attention to how superb the original still is.   And the new version has the benefit of literally adding to the chorus.    Those who bravely gave perfection another try deserve our thanks not our critique and certainly no one's derision.



InfiniteRegress.tv