"I went to a place to eat. It said 'breakfast at any time.' So I ordered french toast during the Renaissance". --Steven Wright ... If you are a devotee of time travel, check out this song...

Sunday, January 27, 2013

The Hobbit: A Review

Finally had a chance to see The Hobbit, Peter Jackson's beautifully rendered prequel to his Lord of the Rings masterpiece trilogy.

And I mean beautiful.  The Shire never looked more verdant and shimmering.  Rivendell and its falling rivers was just breathtaking - you could practically feel the spray in the theater.  The mountainous passes took your breath away, including a great battle, not just on the mountains, but of the mountains, or at least two mountainous outcroppings.

The characters were well drawn, too.  Bilbo Baggins, at this stage, in this movie, carries none of the weight that his later self and Frodo must bear.  So Bilbo, though older than Frodo, is much more like Merry and Pippin than Frodo in lightness of bearing - much like any Hobbit not beset by the burden of the ring.

The movie, much more a prequel to the Lord of the Rings movie trilogy than a treatment of the original novel, treats to us a delight of characters from the trilogy, including a cameo of Frodo and old Bilbo at the beginning (before the quest in Lord of the Rings begins), Elron (Hugh Weaving is one of my favorite all-time actors), Galadriel, Saruman, of course Gandalf and Gollum, and even that scowling old woman Hobbit in the Shire.  There are also some good characters we haven't encountered before, including a trippin brown Wizard and his team of superfast rabbits, and all manner of Dwarves and Orcs.

Don't expect the profundity of Lord of the Rings, but the movie's a real pleasure to see.

                                          


See also Confessions of a Science Fiction Chauvinist, as Occasioned by Seeing the Two Towers

2 comments:

Unknown said...

The Hobbit film bored me beyond ennui. I go to movies primarily for the story and the acting. The Hobbit featured neither. Instead, I was exposed to the worst of director Peter Jackson's self-indulgences. The film lacked pace, grace and power. It seemed the work of a arrogant film student, intoxicated with her own brilliance.
Probably won't waste my $15 on the next one. What a disappointment.

Paul Levinson said...

Thanks for your comment - different strokes for different folks.

InfiniteRegress.tv