Chuck Todd interviews me about alternate histories

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

"Author's Cut" Kindle edition of The Plot to Save Socrates with Extended Ending Published by JoSara MeDia

I'm delighted to announce that JoSara MeDia has just published a Kindle edition of my novel, The Plot to Save Socrates.

The Plot to Save Socrates was originally published by Tor Books in 2006, and was praised by The New York Daily News (" Da Vinci-esque thriller"), Entertainment Weekly ("challenging fun"), and reviews in dozens of other places.

This author’s cut of The Plot to Save Socrates not only restores a lot of my original wording, but an entire chapter near the end of the novel that features Hypatia of Alexandria.  The novel has a new, specially commissioned cover by Joel Iskowitz, who designed the cover for The Silk Code ebook, and whose designs have appeared on stamps around the world, US coins, and NASA murals.

I chose JoSara MeDia because this small, savvy publisher did such a good job with The Silk Code author's cut ebook brought out this past August. JoSara MeDia has published award-winning authors in multiple formats, including print, eBook, and enhanced eBooks in the form of iPad and Android applications. JoSara MeDia also works with non-profit organizations, such as the Texas State Historical Association, assisting them with strategies and solutions to get their content available in these multiple formats.




Praise for the novel...

"...challenging fun" - Entertainment Weekly

"Da Vinci-esque thriller" - New York Daily News

"...a fun book to read" - Dallas Morning News

"resonates with the current political climate . . . . heroine Sierra Waters is sexy as hell . . . . there's a bite to Levinson's wit" - Brian Charles Clark, Curled Up With A Good Book at curledup.com 

"a journey through time that'll make you think as it thrills ... so accessible, even those generally put off by sci-fi should enjoy the trip." - Rod Lott, bookgasm.com

"Levinson spins a fascinating tale ... An intriguing premise with believable characters and attention to period detail make this an outstanding choice... Highly recommended." - Library Journal,*starred review

"Light, engaging time-travel yarn . . . neatly satisfies the circularity inherent in time travel, whose paradoxes Levinson links to Greek philosophy." - Publishers Weekly

"A thinking person's time travel story... I felt like I was there." - SF Signal

 "This is a dazzling performance. . . .History as science fiction; science fiction as history." - Barry N. Malzberg 

"... quick-to-read, entertaining treatment of the problems inherent in time travel with style and flair" - Booklist

"There's a delightfully old-fashioned feel to The Plot to Save Socrates. . . . Levinson's cool, spare style reminded me of the writing of Isaac Asimov. . ." - Colin Harvey, Strange Horizons

"Paul Levinson's new novel is both very different from anything he has done before and very satisfying. . . . This, I think, is the first of Levinson's novels to deserve to be called a tour de force. Watch for it on award ballots." - Tom Easton, Analog: Science Fiction and Fact

"it's exciting to see a book as daring with both its ideas and its approach to narrative structure as this one hit the shelves . . . It's an absolute treat to sit back and be wrapped up in a story that gives a retro SF premise like time travel such a brilliant new kick, and it's doubly delightful to find the story as fun and entertaining as it is thought-provoking." - SF Reviews.net 

"proves that excellent entertainment can and ought to be intellectually respectable -- a glorious example to us all." - Brian Stableford

"...readers are sure to enjoy his take on the paradoxes of time travel" - BookPage 

"Intricately and intriguingly woven, lots of fun, and extremely thought provoking." - Stanley Schmidt 

"Paul Levinson has outdone himself: The Plot to Save Socrates is a philosophically rich gem full of big ideas and wonderful time-travel tricks." - Robert J. Sawyer

"as happens with Kurt Vonnegut's Billy Pilgrim . . . . the reader soon becomes unstuck in time . . . . Levinson presents one of the most unique books I've ever encountered. A highly recommended read." - Matt St. Amand 

"Paul Levinson brings both intellectual heft and affection for his delightfully depicted characters to this highly original story of time travel . . . bringing all of its threads together in an ending that is emotionally satisfying and extremely moving. The Plot to Save Socrates will provoke thought long after readers have finished the book, at which point many may want to pick it up and read it again, to savor its twists and turns." - Pamela Sargent, SFWeekly

"Fast-paced and full of plot twists." - Davis Enterprise (California)

"an elaborately-reasoned temporal tale - a novelized thought experiment whose logic and ideas Socrates would have approved of" - John Joseph Adams, intergalacticmedicineshow.com

"a philosophically rich, engaging time travel story . . . a charming portrayal of Socrates" - Fantasybookspot.com 

"a fun romp through 2500 years of Western history" - freshfiction.com

"I've never read anything like this before . . . The Plot to Save Socrates is highly, original, creative, and engaging. I enjoyed it from the first page." - Book.of.the.moment. at myspace.com/book_of_the_moment.com

"revels in the possibilities for paradoxes . . . . fresh and welcome" - Steven Silver's Reviews at sfsite

"frankly, he [Levinson] is one of my 'read on sight' authors . . . The Plot to Save Socrates is a tapestry of times and characters and philosophies, with an excellent look at history. . . ." - Jerry Wright, Bewildering Stories at bewilderingstories.com

"a very intelligently written novel . . . ." - GF Willmetts, at SFcrowsnest.com

"Paul Levinson handles a complicated plot and a multitude of characters in a manner that can only be described as masterful. . . . I highly recommend this book, and I won't be surprised if it wins several awards." - Scott M. Sandridge, specmusicmuse

"This book was a lot of fun, and surprisingly poignant at the end. (Yes, I'll admit I cried a little.) . . . I was worried this would be a fairly cold sci-fi book, where I never got to like any of the characters, but somehow by halfway through I found I really cared about them. I'm not sure how Levinson managed that . . . but somehow they all just got inside me." - Lady Amalthea, eharlequin.com

". . . a new metaphor for the literary tradition of time travel." - Robert Blechman, blogcritics.org

"Socrates has always seemed a rather dour and dull figure to me but Paul Levinson breathes new life into this time." - Debbie, ck2skwipsandkritiques.com

"an extremely engaging, entertaining story. . ." - Laurie Thayer, Rambles.net

"truly a thought-provoking, breathtaking, and highly entertaining novel." - Lysette Brodey, PerpetualProse.com

"The Plot to Save Socrates turns on its head Plato's report of Socrates' poisoning ..." - Gerry Elman, Esq., Stanford Alumni Blog

"Doppelgangers, deception, and the sheer amount of historical reference alone make this novel magnificant, but that is not all!... Paul Levinson has created a historical text for all ages, making the plot flow like wine and pleasing to even the most hesitant of readers." - Jenna A, luxuryreading.com 

"I was hooked by the second page." - Kanti Burns, Book Reviews and more

"A lively cast of historical figures populates this epoch-bending adventure, highly recommended especially for fans of alternate history novels!" - Midwest Bookreview




Enjoy listening to audio books? Get a free audio book copy of The Plot to Save Socrates - or any one of 85,000 other titles - with a 14-day trial membership at Audible.com ...






words by Paul Levinson, music by John Anealio, demo by John Anealio

Sunday, December 9, 2012

Dexter 7.11: The "Accident"

So let's get right down to real nitty gritty in Dexter 7.11, tonight's episode in this fabulous, best season of Dexter:  Did Hannah really try to kill Deb, or did she set up her near death to implicate Hannah and split up Dexter and Hannah?

The arguments that Hannah tried to kill Deb:  The bottle of water in Deb's car wreck had the anti-anxiety medication mixed in.  Hannah is a master poisoner.  Hannah had motive (she tried to get Deb to back off on her opposition to Hannah and Dexter and failed) and opportunity (she was in Deb's house).  Pretty convincing.   Convincing enough, apparently, to convince Dexter that Hannah tried to kill Deb.

But there are arguments on the other side of this - arguments that suggest Deb set the "accident" up to break up Dexter and Hannah.  Deb hates Hannah.  Not just because Hannah is a killer who out-manuevered Deb, but because Deb loves Dexter, and more than as a sister.  Deb has not been herself all season - understandable, since she learned Dex was the Bay Harbor Butcher, and has been helping Dex cover up and pursue his serial killing.  Even more important: we just saw Deb, in this episode, brilliantly plant evidence that convinced Matthews that Daokes was indeed the Bay Harbor Butcher (not Laguerta, who's being moved in large part by her love for Doakes).   If Deb is capable of planting such evidence, she could certainly have figured out a way of setting up her own near murder, and make it look like Hannah's work.

But, in Deb's defense: why would she choose to kill herself in a way that indeed could have easily killed her, in a crashing car was that was totalled?

That seems like strong evidence that Deb didn't set it up, and that Hannah tried to kill her.   But, on the other hand, there's also this, which may be the most important evidence - evidence we didn't see.  We the audience did not see the actual crash.  For all we know, Deb - with some outside help - had herself roughed up, had someone crash the car, placed herself in the upside down car, then drank the drugged water so she passed out.

It's a little far fetched, I know, but, I wouldn't put that past Deb, would you?  And there's also this on Hannah's side: as she herself said to Dexter, had she planned on poisoning Deb, wouldn't she have succeeded?

It's a tough call, and I'm probably wrong, but I'm thinking we'll learn, either in this season's finale next week or later, that Hannah was innocent in this.

That's one reason to watch next week.  Another, in an arc that goes back to second season and even the first, is just how will Dexter will manage to prevail over Laguerta.   If he does ... well, he will, in some way, right?   The fact that this question can even be asked shows why this is my favorite season of one of the best series ever to be on television.



And see also Dexter Season 6 Sneak Preview Review ... Dexter 6.4: Two Numbers and Two Killers Equals? ... Dexter 6.5 and 6.6: Decisive Sam ... Dexter 6.7: The State of Nebraska ... Dexter 6.8: Is Gellar Really Real? .... Dexter 6.9: And Gellar Is ... ... Dexter's Take on Videogames in 6.10 ...Dexter and Debra:  Dexter 6.11 ... Dexter Season 6 Finale: Through the Eyes of a Different Love


And see also
 Dexter Season 4: Sneak Preview Review ... The Family Man on Dexter 4.5 ...Dexter on the Couch in 4.6 ... Dexter 4.7: 'He Can't Kill Bambi' ... Dexter 4.8: Great Mistakes ...4.9: Trinity's Surprising Daughter ... 4.10: More than Trinity ... 4.11: The "Soulless, Anti-Family Schmuck" ... 4.12: Revenges and Recapitulations

And see also reviews of Season 3Season's Happy Endings? ... Double Surprise ... Psychotic Law vs. Sociopath Science ... The Bright, Elusive Butterfly of Dexter ... The True Nature of Miguel ...Si Se Puede on Dexter ... and Dexter 3: Sneak Preview Review



Friday, December 7, 2012

Fringe 5.8: Love Triumphant

Fringe continues its excruciatingly beautiful wind-up with another primo episode - 5.8 - in which Peter comes to a fork in the road.  And, unlike Yogi Berra's advice that, if you come to a fork in road, take it, Peter really does make a crucial either/or decision.

The Observer-transforming chip or diode in his brain is doing its job.  Peter is able to plot out futures, make subtle changes to influence them, and therein put the vicious, cold-blooded killer of Etta on a path, not of this Observer-Chief's making, but of Peter's making, and all for the purpose of Peter killing this emotionless bastard.

The problem is that, unsurprisingly, Peter's own humanity is dwindling.  Walter can see with the other diode he's implanted in a dead brain that the diode is causing the cerebral part of the brain to grow, and in that process eclipse the emotional part.   One weakness at this part of the story tonight is why Walter lets Peter out of the lab after Peter refuses to stop his quest.  Walter has explained that the effects may soon be irreversible - why wouldn't Walter then have taken matters into his own hands, and drugged Peter with a view towards getting the implant out of his head?

Well, Olivia does make a far more satisfying vehicle to make this proposition to Peter - which does Peter ultimately prefer, revenge for Etta or Olivia's love?  Olivia has an excellent episode herself, retrieving a magnet, getting captured by bounty hunters, and using one of Etta's bullets to shoot her way free.  She has a great reflection/exhortation about the wondrous things she's seen, universes ripped apart, that no human should see, that rang with the authority of Bladerunner.  And in the last scene, with Peter confirming that he will have The Observer just where Peter will want him tomorrow - in a one-on-one in which Peter will break his neck - Olivia puts her choice to Peter.

I must say I was happily surprised by Peter's choice.   In Fringe, characters in such crucial situations often make decisions unsatisfying to the heart.  Certainly Peter and Olivia have both made such painful decisions on the side of the heart being expendable, necessary to sacrifice, on behalf of a greater cosmic goal.

But, tonight, Peter goes with his heart and removes the implant.  It's a decision that will make me miss Fringe ever more when it's over.




See also Fringe 5.1: Paved Park and Shattered Memories ... Fringe 5.2: Saving Our Humanity ...Fringe 5.4: Ghosts of Fringes Past ... Fringe 5.5: "You Don't Even Know What You Don't Know ... Fringe 5.6: "Dad" ... Fringe 5.7: Father and Son

See also Fringe Returns for Season 4: Almost with Peter ... Fringe 4.2: Better and Worse Selves... Fringe 4.3: Sanity and Son ... Fringe 4.4: Peter's Back, Ectoplasm, and McLuhan ... Fringe 4.5: Double Return ... Fringe 4.6: Time Slips ... Fringe 4.7: The Invisible Man ... Fringe 4.8: The Ramifications of Transformed Alternate Realities ... Fringe 4.9: Elizabeth ... Fringe 4.10: Deceit and Future Vision ... Fringe 4.11: Alternate Astrid ... Fringe 4.12: Double Westfield / Single Olivia... Fringe 4.13: Tea and Telepathy ... Fringe 4.14: Palimpsest ... Fringe 4.15: I Knew It! ... Fringe 4.16: Walter Likes Yiddish ... Fringe 4.17:  Second Chances ... Fringe 4.18: Broyled on Both Sides ... Future Fringe 4.19 ... Fringe 4.20: Bridge ... Fringe 4.21: Shocks ... Fringe Season 4 Finale: Death and Life

See also
 Fringe 3.1: The Other Olivia ... Fringe 3.2: Bad Olivia and Peter ... Fringe 3.3: Our/Their Olivia on the Other Side ... Fringe 3.5: Back from Hiatus, Back from the Amber ... Fringe 3.7: Two Universes Still Nearing Collision ... Fringe 3.8: Long Voyages Home ... Fringe 3.10: The Return of the Eternal Bald Observers ... Flowers for Fringenon in Fringe 3.11 ... Fringe 3.12: The Wrong Coffee  ... Fringe 3.13: Alternate Fringe ... Fringe 3.14: Amber Here ... Fringe 3.15: Young Peter and Olivia ... Fringe 3.16: Walter and Yoko ... Fringe 3.17: Bell, Olivia, Lee, and the Cow ... Fringe 3.18: Clever Walternate ... Fringe 3.19 meets Inception, The Walking Dead, Tron ... Fringe 3.20: Countdown to Season 3 Finale 1 of 3 ... Fringe 3.21:  Ben Frankin, Rimbaldi, and the Future ...Fringe Season 3 Finale: Here's What Happened
 ... Death Not Death in Fringe  


See also reviews of Season 2: Top Notch Return of Fringe Second Season ... Fringe 2.2 and The Mole People ... Fringe 2.3 and the Human Body as Bomb ... Fringe 2.4 Unfolds and Takes Wing... Fringe 2.5: Peter in Alternate Reality and Wi-Fi for the Mind ... A Different Stripe of Fringe in 2.6... The Kid Who Changed Minds in Fringe 2.7 ... Fringe 2.8: The Eternal Bald Observers ... Fringe 2.9: Walter's Journey ... Fringe 2.10: Walter's Brain, Harry Potter, and Flowers for Algernon ... New Fringe on Monday Night: In Alternate Universe? ... Fringe 2.12: Classic Science Fiction Chiante ... Fringe 2.13: "I Can't Let Peter Die Again" ... Fringe 2.14: Walter's Health, Books, and Father ... Fringe 2.15: I'll Take 'Manhatan' ... Fringe 2.16: Peter's Story ... Fringe 2.17: Will Olivia Tell Peter? ... Fringe 2.18: Strangeness on a Train ... Fringe 2.19: Two Plus Infinity ... Fringe the Noir Musical ... Fringe 2.21: Bring on the Alternates ... Fringe 2.22:  Tin Soldiers and Nixon Coming ... Fringe Season 2 Finale: The Switch

See also reviews of Season One Fringe Begins ... Fringe 2 and 3: The Anthology Tightrope ... 4: The Eternal Bald Observer ... 7: A Bullet Can Scramble a Dead Brain's Transmission ... 8. Heroic Walter and Apple Through Steel ... 9. Razor-Tipped Butterflies of the Mind ... 10. Shattered Pieces Come Together Through Space and Times ... 11. A Traitor, a Crimimal, and a Lunatic ... 12, 13, 14: Fringe and Teleportation ... 15: Fringe is Back with Feral Child, Pheromones, and Bald Men ...17. Fringe in New York, with Oliva as Her Suspect ... 18. Heroes and Villains across Fringe ...Stephen King, Arthur C. Clarke, and Star Trek in Penultimate Fringe ... Fringe Alternate Reality Finale: Science Fiction At Its Best



Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Bill O'Reilly Hit Piece on Fordham University

Did you see the classic, textbook piece of propaganda Bill O'Reilly did about Fordham University last night?   Here's a link if you missed it.  O'Reilly starts off saying Fordham "banned" Ann Coulter from a speaking engagement on the campus, then he explains what in fact happened (she wasn't banned), and wraps up with Jesse Watters in front of Fordham with a slapdash compilation of video interviews with students taken out of context to make them look bad and have Fox's viewers get a laugh at their expense.

Here are the facts of the Ann Coulter matter:  Fordham University's Republican Club, a student group, invited her to speak.  Fr. Joseph McShane, President of Fordham University, wrote the Club and university community a strong letter criticizing the invitation of Coulter to Fordham.   The Republican Club considered the points made in the letter and decided to rescind its invitation.

Note that the University President has no direct power over students, not even indirect power.  The president doesn't grade students, or evaluate their progress towards graduation.  The first is done by professors, and the second by professors and deans.  One dean in particular - the Dean of Students - could have banned Coulter from campus, or refused to allow the proposed student event - but that did not happen.   The students decided not to invite her.

No one's First Amendment rights were violated.  No government official prevented Coulter from speaking.   Fr. McShane's expression of opinion not only violated no one's rights, but was morally justified.   Presidents of universities should speak out about issues affecting the university.  And, in fact, he was right to be concerned about Ann Coulter.  She has called Barack Obama a "retard," John Edwards a "faggot," and characterized our immigration policy as designed to reduce the percentage of white people in the American population.   The First Amendment protects her right to say and write such things without government interference.   It does not give her the right to say that in a university community, which strives to teach tolerance and respect for diversity.   One could argue that Fordham University would have indeed been justified in banning Coulter, or any purveyor of epithets and racist reasoning.  And, yet, Fordham showed tolerance by not banning Coulter.

Why then did O'Reilly characterize the Coulter affair as a banning?   Because, like all clever propagandists, he knows that big lies stick, even after the purveyor of the lie quietly explains what actually happened.   O'Reilly last night explained that Coulter wasn't actually banned, because he wants to be on record as presenting the facts when he's called on lying about Coulter being banned.  Like all propagandists, he wants both the benefit of his lie and protection from its consequences.

As for the Watters piece, we've seen this technique over and over again on Fox: ambush people on the street, ask them questions, call upon them to give details, and then splice it all together to show how uniformed they are.   But the young woman who said Coulter was a racist was right (she also happens to be one of my students).   She couldn't cite an example on the spot, but she was right nonetheless.   Don't believe me?  Look up Coulter's article on Wikipedia.  Even Watters could have done that, had he been interested in the truth.

The facts in this case have been out there for a month, regarding Coulter's invitation to Fordham, and longer regarding her abusive language.  But Fox and O'Reilly are not interested in truth or even facts.  Poorly researched and reasoned - O'Reilly at one point wrongly says that a public university would have gotten into big trouble had it banned Coulter (not true) - O'Reilly's segments have devolved from being pointed, politically abrasive presentations, which are valuable in our body politic, to sad examples of how to bungle and mispresent a story for a quick round of ignorant applause.

Tuesday, December 4, 2012

Bones 8.9: I Am A Camera

Bones rounded out its 2012 offerings with an episode - 8.9 - that was most memorable in its technique. It had heart aplenty, too, but that's something that's always been a part of Bones, and we've been getting more and more of this unique season.

The technique is known by various names, most commonly as P. O. V. Cam,  but I like to think of it as "I am a camera" - also the name of a play, a movie, and a song.   A "Murderer P. O. V." can be effectively frightening, if every scene we see is through the eyes of a murderer stalking victims.  Since we don't actually see the face of the murderer, we get a pure dose of the intent to murder, as the victim is stalked.   Bones 8.9 turns this around, by giving us an almost complete episode with a "Victim P. O. V."  Since this is Bones, the victim is dead.  And we see all of our characters from his perspective - a 14-year old boy, with a love for a girl and talent for song.

The technique works beautifully, giving us a standout, standalone episode.  The plot itself is not the thing - it's seeing all of our characters, Bones and Booth and the whole gang, from the equidistant perspective of the victim's perception.   Further, since all that physically exists of the victim is a skull and bones, there's not much to really see of him, which allows his consciousness and perception of the other characters free reign on the screen.

Cyndi Lauper has nifty guest role, as a psychic in touch with the nearly departed victim.  More than wanting the circumstances of his demise to be known, the victim wants to profess his love and profess it through a song that he wrote.  Cyndi is thus especially appropriate as the guest star.

And her spirit animates the ending with Bones, Booth, and Christine at home.   With the case solved, and the victim able to move on, we see our leading family back in regular filmic perspective and in fine dancing form.   Not only do girls just wanna have fun, but Booth does too, and our grooving trio provides a farewell to 2012 and invitation to more good times to come in 2013.

See also Bones 8.1: Walk Like an Egyptian ... Bones 8.2 of Contention ... Bones 8.3: Not Rotting Behind a Desk  ... Bones 8.4: Slashing Tiger and Donald Trump ... Bones 8.5: Applesauce on Election Eve ... Bones 8.6: Election Day ... Bones 8.7: Dollops in the Sky with Diamonds ... Bones 8.8: The Talking Remains

And see also Bones 7.1: Almost Home Sweet Home ... Bones 7.2: The New Kid and the Fluke ...Bones 7.3: Lance Bond and Prince Charmington ... Bones 7.4: The Tush on the Xerox ... Bones 7.5: Sexy Vehicle ... Bones 7.6: The Reassembler ... Bones 7.7: Baby! ... Bones 7.8: Parents ...Bones 7.9: Tabitha's Salon ... Bones 7.10: Mobile ... Bones 7.11: Truffles and Max ... Bones 7.12: The Corpse is Hanson ... Bones Season 7 Finale: Suspect Bones

And see also Bones 6.1: The Linchpin ... Bones 6.2: Hannah and her Prospects ... Bones 6.3 at the Jersey Shore, Yo, and Plymouth Rock ... Bones 6.4 Sans Hannah ... Bones 6.5: Shot and Pretty ... Bones 6.6: Accidental Relations ... Bones 6.7:  Newman and "Death by Chocolate" ...Bones 6.8: Melted Bones ... Bones 6.9: Adelbert Ames, Jr. ... Bones 6.10: Reflections ... Bones 6.11: The End and the Beginning of a Mystery ... Bones 6.12 Meets Big Love ... Bones 6.13: The Marrying Kind ... Bones 6.14: Bones' Acting Ability ... Bones 6.15: "Lunch for the Palin Family" ...Bones 6.16: Stuck in an Elevator, Stuck in Times ... Bones 6.17: The 8th Pair of Feet ... Bones 6.18: The Wile E. Chupacabra ... Bones 6.19 Test Runs The Finder ... Bones 6.20: This Very Statement is a Lie ... Bones 6.21: Sensitive Bones ... Bones 6.22: Phoenix Love ... Bones Season 6 Finale: Beautiful

And see also Bones: Hilarity and Crime and Bones is Back For Season 5: What Is Love? and 5.2: Anonymous Donors and Pipes and 5.3: Bones in Amish Country and 5.4: Bones Meets Peyton Place and Desperate Housewives and Ancient Bones 5.5 and Bones 5.6: A Chicken in Every Viewer's Pot and Psychological Bones 5.7 and Bones 5.8: Booth's "Pops" and Bones 5.9 Meets Avatar and Videogamers ... Bad Santa, Heart-Warming Bones 5.10 ... Bones 5.11: Of UFOs, Bloggers, and Triangles ... Bones 5.12: A Famous Skeleton and Angela's Baby ... Love with Teeth on Bones 5.13 ... Faith vs. Science vs. Psychology in Bones 5.14 ... Page 187 in Bones 5.15 ...Bones 100: Two Deep Kisses and One Wild Relationship ... Bones 5.17: The Deadly Stars ...Bones Under Water in 5.18 ... Bones 5.19: Ergo Together ...  Bones 5.20: Ergo Together ... Bones 5.21: The Rarity of Happy Endings ... Bones Season 5 Finale: Eye and Evolution

InfiniteRegress.tv