- Maybe Mubarak changed his mind.
- Maybe the Egyptian military, whose spokesman stood up in Tahrir Square and told the protesters they would get everything they wanted, were pulling some kind of elaborate feat of disinformation to gauge the consequences.
- Maybe we should not give the media quite so much attention when they predict rather than report the news.
Indeed, by that very action, the media provided a vivid reason for following what the Egyptian administration said to the Egyptian people today: stop paying so much attention to what you hear and see in the media.
That's generally very bad advice. We and everyone in the world should be paying attention to what the media are saying - democracy is impossible without information. But this means the media need to be more careful than they were today in their reporting. When the fate of a nation hangs in the balance, the best course of action for news media is to show a little more restraint - less speculation, more facts.
4 comments:
I dunno if I'd put all the blame on the media. My understanding was that speculation was based on information from Leon Panetta, who apparently did believe Mubarak would be stepping down. That suggests that the CIA is operating with faulty information, which might be even more frightening than the media being wrong, depending on your point of view.
Actually, I heard just the opposite - that Panetta got his information from the media. MSNBC commentators were criticizing Panetta, saying he'd be better off getting his info the traditional way - from his assets in the field.
Wow. That's not the sense I got from CNN at all. If MSNBC is right, that's even worse.
Yes, I agree with you Paul. Media is a powerful weapon that relied by most of the people. So they want to cut the exaggeration and give facts.
Post a Comment